Abstract
In the context of increasing human rights litigation on climate change, this article examines the potential to include labour-related concerns regarding just transitions. Taking the European Convention on Human Rights as a case study, the argument is made that there is potential to do so, not only utilising Articles 2 and 8, but also Articles 10 and 11. The scope of the European Court of Human Rights case law is examined in this respect. The article examines case law which is indicative of the potential application of Articles 2 and 8 to work and the environment, alongside the prospects of combining claims under Articles 10 and 11. Emerging jurisprudence on Articles 10 and 11 may be significant for, as recent study of ‘human rights experimentalism’ indicates, efficacious engagement in human rights litigation requires collective voice from those most affected, both in terms of crafting claims and implementing judgments. Their recognition in the context of combined environmental and labour concerns would be an important step towards transformational structural change relating to ‘just transition’.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 439-452 |
| Journal | International Journal of Comparative Labour Law |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 3/4 |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Sept 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Research Groups and Themes
- Perspectives on Work
- Smart Networks for Sustainable Futures
- Centre for Global Law and Innovation
- Centre for Law at Work
- Human Rights Implementation Centre
- Centre for International Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Human rights as a regulatory tool for ‘just transition’ in Europe (and beyond)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver