Hypertension is an indication for surgery in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Dorien de Waard, Pieter Dik, Marc R Lilien, Esther T Kok, Tom P V M de Jong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To our knowledge hypertension in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction has not been reported in the literature as an indication for surgery. In addition, there has been no systematic research into the effect of relief of obstruction on existing hypertension. The aim of this study was to evaluate the proportion of children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction with hypertension diagnosed preoperatively, and how hypertension developed after relief of the obstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients operated on at our institution in the last 10 years for relief of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

RESULTS: Data were evaluated on 227 patients treated for ureteropelvic junction obstruction during the period 1996 to 2006. Preoperatively 11 of these patients had been diagnosed with hypertension. Hypertension alone was the major indication for surgery in 7 of these 11 patients. Postoperatively 10 patients became normotensive, while 1 is still receiving antihypertensive medication.

CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that hypertension should be looked for in patients with dilated or obstructed upper urinary tracts, and considered an indication for surgery. In the vast majority of cases relief of obstruction cures hypertension.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1976-8; discussion 1978-9
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume179
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2008

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypertension, Renal
  • Infant
  • Male
  • Ureteral Obstruction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hypertension is an indication for surgery in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this