ICT and cities revisited

Emmanouil Tranos*, Yannis M Ioannides*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
170 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper tests whether or not adoption of information and communication technologies (ICT) has offset agglomeration benefits and led to more dispersed spatial structures worldwide. The paper returns to Ioannides et al. (2008) and confirms, first by relying on the Pareto (Zipf) coefficient of the city size distribution as a proxy of spatial dispersion, that the diffusion of fixed telephony has caused more dispersed urban structures worldwide, in other words, greater urban decentralization. Similar causal effects are established for mobile telephony, which are novel, and the internet, which extend previous research. They are confirmed for such alternative measures of dispersion as the Gini coefficient, the Herfindahl index, and the coefficient of variation.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101439
Number of pages13
JournalTelematics and Informatics
Volume55
Early online date4 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We are grateful to many audience members at the 2016 Annual Winter Seminar of the German speaking section of the European Regional Science Association, the North American Regional Science Council meetings, and Fall 2018 Opportunity and Inclusive Growth Conference, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, MN. We are also grateful to Max Nathan for very helpful comments, and to Esteban Rossi-Hansberg and anonymous reviewers, whose suggestions have not been yet fully incorporated in this version. Naturally, all errors are ours.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020

Structured keywords

  • Jean Golding

Keywords

  • Cities
  • Information and communication technologies
  • Internet
  • Pareto
  • Spatial structure
  • Zipf

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ICT and cities revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this