Identification and prioritisation of items for a draft participant-reported questionnaire to measure use of social care, informal care, aids and adaptations

Kirsty M Garfield*, Gail A Thornton, Samantha K Husbands, Ailsa M Cameron, William Hollingworth, Sian M Noble, Paul Roy, Joanna C Thorn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Background
Resource-use measurement is integral for assessing cost-effectiveness within trial-based economic evaluations. Methods for gathering resource-use data from participants are not well developed, with questionnaires typically produced for each trial and rarely validated. The healthcare module of a generic, modular resource-use measure, designed for collecting self-report resource-utilisation data, has recently been developed in the UK. The objective of this research is to identify and prioritise items for new, bolt-on modules, covering informal care, social care and personal expenses incurred due to health and care needs.

Methods
Identification and prioritisation, conducted between April and December 2021, involved a rapid review of questionnaires included in the Database of Instruments for Resource Use Measurement and economic evaluations published from 2011 to 2021 to identify candidate items, an online survey of UK-based social care professionals to identify omitted social care items and focus groups with UK-based health economists and UK-based people who access social care services either for themselves or as carers to prioritise items.

Results
The review identified 203 items. Over half of the 24 survey respondents reported no missing items. Five academic health economists and four people who access social care services participated in focus groups. Feedback shaped the social and informal care modules and indicated that no specific personal expenses were essential to collect in all trials. Aids/adaptations were highlighted as costly personal expenses when relevant; therefore, the personal expenses module was narrowed to aids/adaptations only.

Conclusion
Draft informal care, social care and aids/adaptations modules were developed, ready for further testing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)431-443
Number of pages13
JournalPharmacoEconomics - Open
Volume8
Issue number3
Early online date7 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Research Groups and Themes

  • HEHP@Bristol

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identification and prioritisation of items for a draft participant-reported questionnaire to measure use of social care, informal care, aids and adaptations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this