Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Identification of potential mediators of the relationship between body mass index and colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomization analysis

  • Emmanouil Bouras
  • , Dipender Gill
  • , Verena Zuber
  • , Neil Murphy
  • , Niki L Dimou
  • , Krasimira Aleksandrova
  • , Sarah J Lewis
  • , Richard M Martin
  • , James Yarmolinsky
  • , Demetrius Albanes
  • , Hermann Brenner
  • , Sergi Castellví-Bel
  • , Andrew T. Chan
  • , Iona Cheng
  • , Stephen B. Gruber
  • , Bethany Van Guelpen
  • , Christopher I. Li
  • , Loic Le Marchand
  • , Polly A Newcomb
  • , Shuji Ogino
  • Andrew J Pellatt, Stephanie L. Schmit, Alicja Wolk, Anna H. Wu, Ulrike Peters, Marc J Gunter, Konstantinos K Tsilidis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract

Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third-most-common cancer worldwide and its rates are increasing. Elevated body mass index (BMI) is an established risk factor for CRC, although the molecular mechanisms behind this association remain unclear. Using the Mendelian randomization (MR) framework, we aimed to investigate the mediating effects of putative biomarkers and other CRC risk factors in the association between BMI and CRC.

Methods
We selected as mediators biomarkers of established cancer-related mechanisms and other CRC risk factors for which a plausible association with obesity exists, such as inflammatory biomarkers, glucose homeostasis traits, lipids, adipokines, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), sex hormones, 25-hydroxy-vitamin D, smoking, physical activity (PA) and alcohol consumption. We used inverse-variance weighted MR in the main univariable analyses and performed sensitivity analyses (weighted-median, MR–Egger, Contamination Mixture). We used multivariable MR for the mediation analyses.

Results
Genetically predicted BMI was positively associated with CRC risk [odds ratio per SD (5 kg/m2) = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08–1.24, P-value = 1.4 × 10−5] and robustly associated with nearly all potential mediators. Genetically predicted IGF1, fasting insulin, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking, PA and alcohol were associated with CRC risk. Evidence for attenuation was found for IGF1 [explained 7% (95% CI: 2–13%) of the association], smoking (31%, 4–57%) and PA (7%, 2–11%). There was little evidence for pleiotropy, although smoking was bidirectionally associated with BMI and instruments were weak for PA.

Conclusions
The effect of BMI on CRC risk is possibly partly mediated through plasma IGF1, whereas the attenuation of the BMI–CRC association by smoking and PA may reflect confounding and shared underlying mechanisms rather than mediation.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberdyae067
JournalInternational Journal of Epidemiology
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 May 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
# The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Groups and Themes

  • ICEP

Keywords

  • body mass index
  • BMI
  • obesity
  • mediation analysis
  • colorectal cancer
  • CRC
  • mendelian randomisation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identification of potential mediators of the relationship between body mass index and colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomization analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this