Identifying priorities for future research on reducing and stopping psychiatric medication: results of a James Lind Alliance priority-setting partnership

Miriam Boland, Agnes Higgins, Claire Beecher, Pat Bracken, Wendy Burn, Anne Cody, Adele Framer, Toto Gronlund, Mark Horowitz, Christy Huff, Sandra Jayacodi, Dolores Keating, David Kessler, Åsa Konradsson-Geuken, Nicole Lamberson, Luke Montagu, Ruth Smith, Cathal Cadogan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective:
The objective of this study is to identify the top 10 research priorities on reducing and stopping psychiatric medication that reflect the perspectives and unmet needs of three key stakeholder groups (people with lived experience, family members/carers/supporters and healthcare professionals).

Methods:
A priority-setting partnership was conducted using the James Lind Alliance’s seven-step process. This involved (1) creating an international Steering Group of key stakeholder representatives and (2) identifying potential partners; (3) gathering stakeholders’ uncertainties about reducing and stopping psychiatric medication using an online survey and summarising the survey responses; (4) checking the summary questions against existing evidence and verifying uncertainties; (5) shortlisting the questions using a second online survey; (6) determining the top 10 research questions through a prioritisation workshop; and (7) disseminating the results.

Results:
A total of 3635 questions were collected in the initial survey from 884 respondents of which 32 questions were verified as uncertainties. These questions were then ranked in a second online survey by 526 respondents and the findings discussed in a final prioritisation workshop by 30 participants to produce the final top 10 list of research questions. These questions cover a range of areas including the most effective ways of safely reducing/stopping psychiatric medication and providing support to individuals undergoing the discontinuation process, as well as the best ways to educate healthcare professionals on this topic.

Conclusion:
The top 10 list of research priorities was produced through extensive engagement with key stakeholders and highlights important uncertainties and gaps in the existing evidence base that need to be addressed by future research.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere088266
Number of pages11
JournalBMJ Open
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024.

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Mental Disorders/drug therapy
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Stakeholder Participation
  • Health Priorities
  • Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Male
  • Research
  • Adult
  • Health Personnel/psychology
  • Caregivers/psychology
  • Middle Aged

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying priorities for future research on reducing and stopping psychiatric medication: results of a James Lind Alliance priority-setting partnership'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this