Identifying the consequences of dynamic treatment strategies: A decision theoretic overview

AP Dawid, V Didelez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We consider the problem of learning about and comparing the consequences of dynamic treatment strategies on the basis of observational data. We formulate this within a probabilistic decision-theoretic framework. Our approach is compared with related work by Robins and others: in particular, we show how Robins's `G-computation' algorithm arises naturally from this decision-theoretic perspective. Careful attention is paid to the mathematical and substantive conditions required to justify the use of this formula. These conditions revolve around a property we term stability, which relates the probabilistic behaviours of observational and interventional regimes. We show how an assumption of `sequential randomization' (or `no unmeasured confounders'), or an alternative assumption of `sequential irrelevance', can be used to infer stability. Probabilistic influence diagrams are used to simplify manipulations, and their power and limitations are discussed. We compare our approach with alternative formulations based on causal DAGs or potential response models. We aim to show that formulating the problem of assessing dynamic treatment strategies as a problem of decision analysis brings clarity, simplicity and generality.
Translated title of the contributionIdentifying the consequences of dynamic treatment strategies: A decision theoretic overview
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)184 - 231
Number of pages48
JournalStatistics Surveys
Volume4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying the consequences of dynamic treatment strategies: A decision theoretic overview'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this