Ideology in management studies

Hannele Seeck, Andrew Sturdy, Anne-Laure Boncori, Martin Fougère

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)
344 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ideology is a core and contested concept in the social sciences, but also long deployed in management research to highlight the political, embedded and/or obscuring nature of ideas. Indeed, many would argue that management itself is inherently ideological in legitimating or privileging managerial interests and concealing other groups and ways of organising. In the first systematic review of how ideology has been conceptualized in management studies, this article explores its diverse and changing meanings in order to develop and sustain the concept. It is based on a heuristic review of 175 articles and 41 books published between 1956 and 2018. Further developing categories used in the social sciences around its role, we found views of ideology as: (1) domination; (2) legitimation; (3) interpretation; (4) integration and; (5) normative logic. In addition, emerging perspectives were identified where ideology was an (6) object of critique; and (7) fantasy structuring social reality. We describe, illustrate and evaluate these, often internally diverse and interrelated, perspectives as well as compare them with sometimes competing notions within the management field, such as discourse, culture and legitimation. We also bring together the different approaches and argue for a pluralist, but not infinitely flexible, approach to the concept. In doing so, we identify research agendas for ideology within management and organisation studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-74
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Management Reviews
Volume22
Issue number1
Early online date13 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • ideology
  • management
  • review
  • social science
  • discourse
  • culture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ideology in management studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this