Skip to content

Ideology in management studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-74
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Management Reviews
Issue number1
Early online date13 Aug 2019
DateAccepted/In press - 11 Jul 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print - 13 Aug 2019
DatePublished (current) - 14 Jan 2020


Ideology is a core and contested concept in the social sciences, but also long deployed in management research to highlight the political, embedded and/or obscuring nature of ideas. Indeed, many would argue that management itself is inherently ideological in legitimating or privileging managerial interests and concealing other groups and ways of organising. In the first systematic review of how ideology has been conceptualized in management studies, this article explores its diverse and changing meanings in order to develop and sustain the concept. It is based on a heuristic review of 175 articles and 41 books published between 1956 and 2018. Further developing categories used in the social sciences around its role, we found views of ideology as: (1) domination; (2) legitimation; (3) interpretation; (4) integration and; (5) normative logic. In addition, emerging perspectives were identified where ideology was an (6) object of critique; and (7) fantasy structuring social reality. We describe, illustrate and evaluate these, often internally diverse and interrelated, perspectives as well as compare them with sometimes competing notions within the management field, such as discourse, culture and legitimation. We also bring together the different approaches and argue for a pluralist, but not infinitely flexible, approach to the concept. In doing so, we identify research agendas for ideology within management and organisation studies.

    Research areas

  • ideology, management, review, social science, discourse, culture



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Wiley at Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 499 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 13/08/21

    Request copy


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups