Immunologic response in treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients: the IeDEA West Africa cohort

Eric Balestre, Didier Ekouevi, Boris Tchounga, Serge P Eholie, Eugene Messou, Adrien Sawadogo, Rodolphe Thiébaut, Margaret T May, Jonathan A C Sterne, F Dabis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
484 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Response to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) is poorly described. We compared the immunological response among patients treated with three nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) to boosted protease inhibitor (PI) and unboosted PI-based regimens in West Africa.

Methods: 
This prospective cohort study enrolled treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients within the International epidemiological Database to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) collaboration in West Africa. We used mixed models to compare the CD4 count response to treatment  over 12 months between regimens.

Results:
Of 422 HIV-2-infected patients, 285 (67.5%) were treated with a boosted PI-based regimen, 104 (24.6%)with an unboosted PI-based regimen and 33 (7.8%) with three NRTIs. Treatment groups were comparable with regard to gender (54.5% female) and median age at ART initiation (45.3 years; interquartile range [IQR] 38.3-51.8). Treatment groups differed by clinical stage (21.2%, 17.3%, and 16.8% at CDC stage C or WHO stage IV for the triple NRTI, boosted PI, and unboosted PI groups, respectively,p=0.02), median length of follow-up (12.9, 17.7, and 44.0 months for the triple NRTI, the boosted PI, and the unboosted PI groups, respectively, p<0.001) and baseline median CD4 count (192, 173, and 129 cells/µl in the triple NRTI,the boosted PI, and the unboosted PI-based regimen groups, respectively, p=0.003).CD4 count recovery at 12 months was higher for patients treated with boosted PI-based regimens than those treated with three NRTIs or with unboostedPI-based regimens (191 cells/µl; 95% CI 142;241, 110 cells/µl; 95% CI 29;192,133 cells/µl 95% CI 80;186, respectively, p=0.004).

Conclusions: In this observational study using African data, boosted PI-containing regimens had better immunological response compared to triple NRTI combinations and unboosted PI-based regimens at 12 months. A randomized clinical trial is still required to determine the best initial regimen for treating HIV-2 infected patients.
Original languageEnglish
Article number20044
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the International AIDS Society
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Feb 2016

Keywords

  • HIV-2
  • immunological response
  • antiretroviral treatment
  • linear mixed models
  • West Africa

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Immunologic response in treatment-naïve HIV-2-infected patients: the IeDEA West Africa cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this