Projects per year
Abstract
Presents an evaluation of whether impact assessments (IAs) used when designating marine conservation zones (MCZs) are capable of being a tool for balancing different options and also a reflexive process. Discusses the role of IAs in better regulation, the methodology of the study, involving two case studies from the fishing sector, and how the MCZ evidence is gathered, categorised and used. Considers the benefits and shortcomings of IAs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 93-110 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Public Law |
| Volume | 2016 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2016 |
Keywords
- Fisheries
- Impact assessments
- Marine conservation zones
- Socio-legal studies
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Impact Assessments for nature conservation: effective and reflexive?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Projects
- 1 Finished
Ecologies and Identities: a socio-legal exploration of the Marine Protected Areas network in English seas
Pieraccini, M. & Prosser, T. A. W.
1/10/12 → 1/10/15
Project: Research
Profiles
Dr Margherita Pieraccini
- University of Bristol Law School - Associate Professor in Law
- Cabot Institute for the Environment
- Public Law
Person: Academic , Member
Cite this
Pieraccini, M., & Cardwell, E. J. (2016). Impact Assessments for nature conservation: effective and reflexive? Public Law, 2016(1), 93-110.