Abstract
Introduction:
Insulin autoantibodies (IAA) are key predictors of type 1 diabetes, particularly in young children. Micro-radiobinding assays (RBA) are the gold-standard for IAA measurement but have limitations. We assessed whether a luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assay improved diabetes risk assessment.
Methods:
To validate LIPS compared with RBA, samples from people with new-onset type 1 diabetes (n=150) and first-degree relatives (FDRs) (n=619), of whom 91 had developed diabetes during follow-up, were used. This cross-sectional observational data was analysed using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and cox-proportional hazard models.
Results:
In new-onset diabetes, RBA and LIPS showed 88% agreement in IAA status. Positive IAA LIPS was more common in 89 FDRs with high-moderate affinity IAA (61%) compared with 22 FDRs with low-affinity IAA (18%) (p<0.001). In FDRs positive for multiple other islet autoantibodies, 20-year diabetes risk was 80% for those positive compared with 30% for those negative for IAA by LIPS (p=0.013). IAA LIPS added to diabetes risk independently of status/level of IAA by RBA, other autoantibodies, and sampling age (p<0.001).
Conclusion:
The IAA LIPS low-blood volume, high-throughput technique identifies more individuals with the highest risk of diabetes. The ability to identify high-affinity IAA makes LIPS an ideal method for future clinical trials and population screening strategies to predict risk of diabetes.
Insulin autoantibodies (IAA) are key predictors of type 1 diabetes, particularly in young children. Micro-radiobinding assays (RBA) are the gold-standard for IAA measurement but have limitations. We assessed whether a luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assay improved diabetes risk assessment.
Methods:
To validate LIPS compared with RBA, samples from people with new-onset type 1 diabetes (n=150) and first-degree relatives (FDRs) (n=619), of whom 91 had developed diabetes during follow-up, were used. This cross-sectional observational data was analysed using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and cox-proportional hazard models.
Results:
In new-onset diabetes, RBA and LIPS showed 88% agreement in IAA status. Positive IAA LIPS was more common in 89 FDRs with high-moderate affinity IAA (61%) compared with 22 FDRs with low-affinity IAA (18%) (p<0.001). In FDRs positive for multiple other islet autoantibodies, 20-year diabetes risk was 80% for those positive compared with 30% for those negative for IAA by LIPS (p=0.013). IAA LIPS added to diabetes risk independently of status/level of IAA by RBA, other autoantibodies, and sampling age (p<0.001).
Conclusion:
The IAA LIPS low-blood volume, high-throughput technique identifies more individuals with the highest risk of diabetes. The ability to identify high-affinity IAA makes LIPS an ideal method for future clinical trials and population screening strategies to predict risk of diabetes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Diabetic Medicine |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 22 Jan 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Improved prediction of symptomatic type 1 diabetes using a luciferase-based assay to measure (pro)insulin autoantibodies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver