Skip to content

In defence of biodiversity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)969–997
Number of pages29
JournalBiology and Philosophy
Volume32
Issue number6
Early online date19 Sep 2017
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 29 Jun 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 19 Sep 2017
DatePublished (current) - Dec 2017

Abstract

The concept of biodiversity has played a central role within conservation biology over the last thirty years. Precisely how it should be understood, however, is a matter of ongoing debate. In this paper we defend what we call a classic multidimensional conception of biodiversity. We begin by introducing two arguments for eliminating the concept of biodiversity from conservation biology, both of which have been put forward in a recent paper by Carlos Santana (2014). The first argument is against the concept’s scientific usefulness. The other is against its value as a target of conservation. We show that neither of these objections is successful against the classic multidimensional conception of biodiversity. Biodiversity thus understood is important from a scientific perspective, because it plays important explanatory roles within contemporary ecology. Moreover, although it does not encompass all valuable features of the natural world, this does not show that we should abandon it as a target of conservation. Instead, biodiversity should be conceived as one of many grounds of value associated with ecosystems. This is consistent with concluding that a central aim of conservationists should be to protect biodiversity.

    Research areas

  • Biodiversity, CONSERVATION, ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, ECOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY OF ECOLOGY, ELIMINATIVISM, Philosophy of biology

    Structured keywords

  • Centre for Environmental Humanities
  • Centre for Science and Philosophy

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Springer at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10539-017-9587-x. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 502 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups