In risk we trust? Making decisions about knee replacement

Giles M Birchley*, Wendy A Bertram, Andrew J Moore, Richard Huxtable, Nicholas R Howells, Zoe Chivers, Emma C Johnson, Vikki Wylde, Leah G Jones, Tony D Timlin, Rachael Gooberman-Hill*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Risk communication is a key legal and ethical component of shared decision-making. Decisions about total knee replacement, a common surgery, must contend with the fact that a minority of cases result in unintended outcomes, some of which have devastating effects. To understand how risks are communicated during decision-making, we audio-recorded and analysed 62 consultations between surgeons and patients. Various communication methods were evident, including listing risks without elaboration, discussing them in a conversational manner, abrogating discussion of risk, or using decision-tools. Discussion of risks was often brief in nature, and risk communication was sometimes curtailed or deferred by both patients and surgeons. Risks could also be observed to play a part in reinforcing policy norms of the doctor-patient relationship that highlighted patient responsibility. Nevertheless, patients and surgeons in the observed consultations appeared more interested in developing trusting relationships than in discussing risks. Because patients had sometimes experienced considerable deterioration in their knee function before their consultation, were in pain and struggled with mobility, the realities of clinical practice clashed with the policy norms of choice and patient responsibility. Rather, decisions could appear coerced by the disease process rather than being clear-cut examples of self-determination. While policy norms putatively use risk disclosure to frame communication between patients and clinicians as a transaction between customer and technician, the lack of conformity to these norms in the consultations may indicate resistance to this framing. A greater emphasis on determining positive roles for trust and care would help policy to present a nuanced understanding of decision-making. Risk communication could be seen as a factor in the formation of trusting relationships, improving its role in decision-making processes while recognising its inherent tensions with practice.
Original languageEnglish
Article number117112
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume355
Early online date18 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Risk
  • Shared decision-making
  • Knee Replacement
  • Qualitative
  • United Kingdom

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In risk we trust? Making decisions about knee replacement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this