Incentivising bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) responsibly: Comparing stakeholder policy preferences in the United Kingdom and Sweden

Robert Bellamy*, Mathias Fridahl, Javier Lezaun, James Palmer, Emily Rodriguez, Adrian Lefvert, Anders Hansson, Stefan Grönkvist, Simon Haikola

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) plays a central role in scenario pathways that limit global warming in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. Yet deliberate policy efforts to incentivise BECCS—whether through amending existing climate policies or introducing entirely new ones—remain rare. In this paper, we contend that BECCS must be incentivised responsibly, through policy-making processes which account for diverse and geographically varying societal values and interests. More specifically, we make the case for responsible incentivisation by undertaking a comparative analysis of stakeholder attitudes to four idealised policy scenarios for BECCS, including representatives of government, business, nongovernmental and academic communities, in the UK and Sweden. The scenarios were: business as usual; international policy reform; national BECCS policy; and national policy for negative emissions technologies. Based on our findings, we recommend that policymakers 1) recognise the need to develop new incentives and make enabling reforms to existing policy instruments; 2) consider the risk of mitigation deterrence in their real world (and not abstracted) contexts; 3) employ multi-instrument approaches to incentivisation that do not overly rely on carbon pricing or 4) force a choice between technology specific or technology neutral policies; and 5) attend to the diversity of stakeholder and wider public perspectives that will ultimately determine the success—or failure—of their policy designs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47–55
Number of pages9
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume116
Early online date20 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research received support from ClimateWorks (Grant 16-0954) under the ?Greenhouse gas Removal Instruments and Policies? (GRIP) project, the University of Oxford ESRC IAA Kick Starting Impact Award (Grant 1903-KICK-446), and the Swedish Energy Agency's ?An integrative systems approach to a carbon neutral industry? (Grant 46036-1) and ?Carbon capture and storage in Sweden? (Grant 46222-1) projects.

Funding Information:
This research received support from ClimateWorks (Grant 16-0954 ) under the ‘Greenhouse gas Removal Instruments and Policies’ (GRIP) project , the University of Oxford ESRC IAA Kick Starting Impact Award (Grant 1903-KICK-446 ), and the Swedish Energy Agency’s ‘An integrative systems approach to a carbon neutral industry’ (Grant 46036-1 ) and ‘ Carbon capture and storage in Sweden ’ (Grant 46222-1 ) projects.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incentivising bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) responsibly: Comparing stakeholder policy preferences in the United Kingdom and Sweden'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this