Increasing animal cognition research in zoos

Elias Garcia‐Pelegrin*, Fay Clark, Rachael Miller*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
260 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Animal cognition covers various mental processes including perception, learning, decision-making and memory, and animal behavior is often used as a proxy for measuring cognition. Animal cognition/behavior research has multiple benefits; it provides fundamental knowledge of animal biology and evolution but can also have applied conservation and welfare applications. Zoos provide an excellent yet relatively untapped resource for animal cognition research, because they house a wide variety of species—many of which are under threat—and allow close observation and relatively high experimental control compared to the wild. Multi-zoo collaboration leads to increased sample size and species representation, which in turn leads to more robust science. However, there are salient challenges associated with zoo-based cognitive research, which are animal-based (e.g., small sample sizes at single zoos, untrained/unhabituated subjects, side effects) and human-based (e.g., time restrictions, safety concerns, and perceptions of animals interacting with unnatural technology or apparatus). We aim to increase the understanding and subsequent uptake of animal cognition research in zoos, by transparently outlining the main benefits and challenges. Importantly, we use our own research (1) a study on novelty responses in hornbills, and (2) a multi-site collaboration called the “ManyBirds” Project to demonstrate how challenges may be overcome. These potential options include using “drop and go” apparatuses that require no training, close human contact or animal separation. This study is aimed at zoo animal care and research staff, as well as external researchers interested in zoo-based studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)281-291
Number of pages11
JournalZoo Biology
Volume41
Issue number4
Early online date17 Jan 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Many thanks to Birdworld (Farnham, UK) for access to hornbills for this pilot study, particularly to Duncan Bolton, Kat Nicola, and Polly Bramham. Thank you to Gavin Harrison for feedback on a manuscript draft, and Katy Lee Jones for help with the hornbill testing. Rachael Miller and Elias Garcia-Pelegrin were funded by a Career Support Fund (University of Cambridge) awarded to Rachael Miller. At the time of writing, Fay Clark was an honorary research associate at the University of Bristol.

Funding Information:
Many thanks to Birdworld (Farnham, UK) for access to hornbills for this pilot study, particularly to Duncan Bolton, Kat Nicola, and Polly Bramham. Thank you to Gavin Harrison for feedback on a manuscript draft, and Katy Lee Jones for help with the hornbill testing. Rachael Miller and Elias Garcia‐Pelegrin were funded by a Career Support Fund (University of Cambridge) awarded to Rachael Miller. At the time of writing, Fay Clark was an honorary research associate at the University of Bristol.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Zoo Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Increasing animal cognition research in zoos'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this