TY - GEN
T1 - Influence of nonlinear modeling on capacity assessment of RC framed structures
AU - Marino, Edoardo M.
AU - Barbagallo, Francesca
AU - Angiolilli, Michele
AU - Belletti, Beatrice
AU - Camata, Guido
AU - Dellapina, Chiara
AU - Di Domenico, Mariano
AU - Fiorentino, Gabriele
AU - Gregori, Amedeo
AU - Lavorato, Davide
AU - Lima, Carmine
AU - Martinelli, Enzo
AU - Rasulo, Alessandro
AU - Ricci, Paolo
AU - Ruggieri, Sergio
AU - Spacone, Enrico
AU - Terrenzi, Marco
AU - Uva, Giuseppina
AU - Verderame, Gerardo
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Many existing buildings in the world present serious seismic deficiencies and need to be retrofitted. However, the basis for an effective seismic retrofit intervention is a reliable assessment of the structure. To this end, nowadays structural engineers can simulate the response of structures subjected to earthquake excitation by nonlinear numerical models. These models consider explicitly the mechanical nonlinearities of the structural members, identify the parts of the structure where yielding takes place, quantify the demand of plastic deformation and force. Furthermore, a number of models is available to carry out the nonlinear analysis of structures. All these models are able to provide a detailed representation of the seismic response of the structure. However, they are controlled by many parameters that need to be properly set to obtain an accurate prediction of the response. Based on the framework depicted above, the target of the Reinforced Concrete Work Package 2 of the ReLUIS 2018 project was to examine and compare different nonlinear modelling techniques used to evaluate the response of structures by pushover analysis. To this end, a case study building is analysed by the eight research units involved in the project by different nonlinear numerical models. The building presents very different lateral stiffness and strength in the longitudinal and transverse directions. Each numerical model is run two times including and not including the masonry infills. Furthermore, pushover analysis is run two times with forces in the longitudinal and transverse directions. Finally, the results are compared to illustrate advantages and limitations of each nonlinear modelling technique.
AB - Many existing buildings in the world present serious seismic deficiencies and need to be retrofitted. However, the basis for an effective seismic retrofit intervention is a reliable assessment of the structure. To this end, nowadays structural engineers can simulate the response of structures subjected to earthquake excitation by nonlinear numerical models. These models consider explicitly the mechanical nonlinearities of the structural members, identify the parts of the structure where yielding takes place, quantify the demand of plastic deformation and force. Furthermore, a number of models is available to carry out the nonlinear analysis of structures. All these models are able to provide a detailed representation of the seismic response of the structure. However, they are controlled by many parameters that need to be properly set to obtain an accurate prediction of the response. Based on the framework depicted above, the target of the Reinforced Concrete Work Package 2 of the ReLUIS 2018 project was to examine and compare different nonlinear modelling techniques used to evaluate the response of structures by pushover analysis. To this end, a case study building is analysed by the eight research units involved in the project by different nonlinear numerical models. The building presents very different lateral stiffness and strength in the longitudinal and transverse directions. Each numerical model is run two times including and not including the masonry infills. Furthermore, pushover analysis is run two times with forces in the longitudinal and transverse directions. Finally, the results are compared to illustrate advantages and limitations of each nonlinear modelling technique.
KW - Existing buildings
KW - Infills
KW - Nonlinear modeling
KW - Pushover analysis
KW - RC framed structure
KW - Seismic assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077039854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference Contribution (Conference Proceeding)
AN - SCOPUS:85077039854
T3 - COMPDYN Proceedings
SP - 2781
EP - 2795
BT - COMPDYN 2019 - 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Proceedings
A2 - Papadrakakis, Manolis
A2 - Fragiadakis, Michalis
PB - National Technical University of Athens
T2 - 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, COMPDYN 2019
Y2 - 24 June 2019 through 26 June 2019
ER -