Institutional Logics in the UK Construction Industry’s Response to Modern Slavery Risk: Complementarity and Conflict

Chris Pesterfield*, Michael Rogerson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a growing understanding that modern slavery is a phenomenon ‘hidden in plain sight’ in the home countries of multinational firms. Yet business scholarship on modern slavery has so far focused on product supply chains. To address this, we direct attention to the various institutional pressures on the UK construction industry, and managers of firms within it, around modern slavery risk for on-site labour. Based on a unique data set of 30 in-depth interviews with construction firm managers and directors, we identify two institutional logics as being integral to explaining how these companies have responded to the Modern Slavery Act: a market logic and a state logic. While the institutional logics literature largely assumes that institutional complexity will lead to a conciliation of multiple logics, we find both complementarity and continued conflict in the logics in our study. Though we identify conciliation between aspects of the market logic and the state logic, conflict remains as engagement with actions which could potentially address modern slavery is limited by the trade-offs between the two logics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-75
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume191
Issue number1
Early online date7 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional Logics in the UK Construction Industry’s Response to Modern Slavery Risk: Complementarity and Conflict'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this