Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Institutionalised Commitment and Its Origins

Saira Khan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Schelling (1960) and Frank (1988) famously offered commitment as an explanation of the stability of human cooperation in the face of incentives to cheat. Reputationally-enforced commitments were part of the explanation for human cooperation for much of our history (Khan, 2024, 2025). In this article, I consider the origins and effects of institutionalised commitments. These are commitments which are contractually enforced by third parties, rather than only reputationally enforced. I discuss how these commitment offer advantages for securing cooperation over and above our previous forms of commitment. I then offer an account of their potential origins. I suggest that a change in our cooperative landscape and organisational structure occurring in the Neolithic -- in particular, the rise of agricultural economies and hierarchical society -- opened the door to a new means of enforcement for commitments, affecting the success of our cooperative practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-103
Number of pages27
JournalHuman Nature
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2026

Keywords

  • Institution
  • Neolithic
  • Evolution
  • Commitment
  • Cooperation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Institutionalised Commitment and Its Origins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this