Skip to content

Interculturalism: not a new policy paradigm

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Standard

Interculturalism : not a new policy paradigm. / Modood, Tariq.

In: Comparative Migration Studies, Vol. 6, No. 22, 19.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Modood, Tariq. / Interculturalism : not a new policy paradigm. In: Comparative Migration Studies. 2018 ; Vol. 6, No. 22.

Bibtex

@article{8446cd6c16644742a3c763200c91abd6,
title = "Interculturalism: not a new policy paradigm",
abstract = "The central question of the symposium has been whether interculturalism provides a new paradigm that transcends multiculturalism? I note that, consistent with my own position, none of the commentaries answers this question in the affirmative. I concur with the view that interculturalist approaches suffer from an indeterminacy in the use of concepts such as local, place and proximity. When such concepts are given specification, they can have two different meanings: a) face to face encounters, b) urban life and/or governance. Whilst (a) and (b) can be connected together, a dichotimising logic is employed by interculturalists relation to the micro-macro and the city-national. I conclude by specifying, by reference to my work, the key features of multiculturalism that a replacement paradigm has to engage with.",
author = "Tariq Modood",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1186/s40878-018-0091-5",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Comparative Migration Studies",
issn = "2214-594X",
publisher = "SpringerOpen",
number = "22",

}

RIS - suitable for import to EndNote

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interculturalism

T2 - not a new policy paradigm

AU - Modood, Tariq

PY - 2018/6/19

Y1 - 2018/6/19

N2 - The central question of the symposium has been whether interculturalism provides a new paradigm that transcends multiculturalism? I note that, consistent with my own position, none of the commentaries answers this question in the affirmative. I concur with the view that interculturalist approaches suffer from an indeterminacy in the use of concepts such as local, place and proximity. When such concepts are given specification, they can have two different meanings: a) face to face encounters, b) urban life and/or governance. Whilst (a) and (b) can be connected together, a dichotimising logic is employed by interculturalists relation to the micro-macro and the city-national. I conclude by specifying, by reference to my work, the key features of multiculturalism that a replacement paradigm has to engage with.

AB - The central question of the symposium has been whether interculturalism provides a new paradigm that transcends multiculturalism? I note that, consistent with my own position, none of the commentaries answers this question in the affirmative. I concur with the view that interculturalist approaches suffer from an indeterminacy in the use of concepts such as local, place and proximity. When such concepts are given specification, they can have two different meanings: a) face to face encounters, b) urban life and/or governance. Whilst (a) and (b) can be connected together, a dichotimising logic is employed by interculturalists relation to the micro-macro and the city-national. I conclude by specifying, by reference to my work, the key features of multiculturalism that a replacement paradigm has to engage with.

U2 - 10.1186/s40878-018-0091-5

DO - 10.1186/s40878-018-0091-5

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 29984186

VL - 6

JO - Comparative Migration Studies

JF - Comparative Migration Studies

SN - 2214-594X

IS - 22

ER -