Interculturalism: not a new policy paradigm

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate (Academic Journal)peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
273 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The central question of the symposium has been whether interculturalism provides a new paradigm that transcends multiculturalism? I note that, consistent with my own position, none of the commentaries answers this question in the affirmative. I concur with the view that interculturalist approaches suffer from an indeterminacy in the use of concepts such as local, place and proximity. When such concepts are given specification, they can have two different meanings: a) face to face encounters, b) urban life and/or governance. Whilst (a) and (b) can be connected together, a dichotimising logic is employed by interculturalists relation to the micro-macro and the city-national. I conclude by specifying, by reference to my work, the key features of multiculturalism that a replacement paradigm has to engage with.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalComparative Migration Studies
Volume6
Issue number22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jun 2018

Structured keywords

  • SPAIS Centre for the Study of Ethnicity and Citizenship

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Interculturalism: not a new policy paradigm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this