Interference-based forgetting in verbal short-term memory

Stephan Lewandowsky*, Sonja M. Geiger, Klaus Oberauer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article presents four experiments that tested predictions of SOB (Serial Order in a Box), an interference-based theory of short-term memory. Central to SOB is the concept of novelty-sensitive encoding, which holds that items are encoded to the extent that they differ from already-encoded information. On the additional assumption that distractors are encoded into memory in the same manner as list items, the theory predicts differential effects of interfering activity based on the similarity structure of distractors. Consistent with predictions, three experiments showed that overt articulation of distractors in between recalls of list items did not affect forgetting when the same distractor was repeated multiple times, whereas forgetting was observed if several different distractors were articulated within the same time span. A fourth experiment showed that the absence of forgetting with repeated articulations of the same item was not due to compensatory attentional refreshing of memory traces. The data support the notion that forgetting from short-term memory arises from interference and are difficult to reconcile with temporal decay. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200-222
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2008

Research Groups and Themes

  • Cognitive Science

Keywords

  • short-term memory
  • computational models of memory
  • forgetting
  • SERIAL-RECALL
  • PHONOLOGICAL SIMILARITY
  • MAINTENANCE REHEARSAL
  • WORD-LENGTH
  • WORKING-MEMORY
  • MODEL
  • ORDER
  • RETENTION
  • SPAN
  • TIME

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interference-based forgetting in verbal short-term memory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this