Abstract
This article presents four experiments that tested predictions of SOB (Serial Order in a Box), an interference-based theory of short-term memory. Central to SOB is the concept of novelty-sensitive encoding, which holds that items are encoded to the extent that they differ from already-encoded information. On the additional assumption that distractors are encoded into memory in the same manner as list items, the theory predicts differential effects of interfering activity based on the similarity structure of distractors. Consistent with predictions, three experiments showed that overt articulation of distractors in between recalls of list items did not affect forgetting when the same distractor was repeated multiple times, whereas forgetting was observed if several different distractors were articulated within the same time span. A fourth experiment showed that the absence of forgetting with repeated articulations of the same item was not due to compensatory attentional refreshing of memory traces. The data support the notion that forgetting from short-term memory arises from interference and are difficult to reconcile with temporal decay. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 200-222 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Journal of Memory and Language |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2008 |
Research Groups and Themes
- Cognitive Science
Keywords
- short-term memory
- computational models of memory
- forgetting
- SERIAL-RECALL
- PHONOLOGICAL SIMILARITY
- MAINTENANCE REHEARSAL
- WORD-LENGTH
- WORKING-MEMORY
- MODEL
- ORDER
- RETENTION
- SPAN
- TIME