Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether a dementia wellbeing service (DWS) signposting people with dementia to community services decreases the rate of avoidable hospital admissions, in-hospital mortality, complexity of admissions (number of comorbidities), or length of stay.
Methods: Interrupted time series analysis to estimate the effects of the DWS on hospital outcomes. We included all unplanned admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (‘avoidable hospital admissions’) with a dementia diagnosis recorded in the Hospital Episode Statistics. The intervention region was compared with a demographically similar control region in the 2 years before and 3 years after the implementation of the new service (October 2013 to September 2018).
Results: There was no strong evidence that admission rates reduced and only weak evidence that the trend in average length of stay reduced slowly over time. In-hospital mortality decreased immediately after the introduction of the dementia wellbeing service compared to control areas (x0.64, 95% CI 0.42, 0.97, p=0.037) but attenuated over the following years. The rate of increase in co-morbidities also appeared to slow after the service began, ending up like the control areas by September 2018.
Conclusions: We found no major impact of the DWS on avoidable hospital admissions, although there was weak evidence for slightly shorter length of stay and reduced complexity of hospital admissions. These findings may or may not reflect a true benefit of the service and require further investigation. The DWS was established to improve quality of dementia care - reducing hospital admissions was never its sole purpose. More targeted interventions may be required to reduce hospital admissions for people with dementia.
Methods: Interrupted time series analysis to estimate the effects of the DWS on hospital outcomes. We included all unplanned admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (‘avoidable hospital admissions’) with a dementia diagnosis recorded in the Hospital Episode Statistics. The intervention region was compared with a demographically similar control region in the 2 years before and 3 years after the implementation of the new service (October 2013 to September 2018).
Results: There was no strong evidence that admission rates reduced and only weak evidence that the trend in average length of stay reduced slowly over time. In-hospital mortality decreased immediately after the introduction of the dementia wellbeing service compared to control areas (x0.64, 95% CI 0.42, 0.97, p=0.037) but attenuated over the following years. The rate of increase in co-morbidities also appeared to slow after the service began, ending up like the control areas by September 2018.
Conclusions: We found no major impact of the DWS on avoidable hospital admissions, although there was weak evidence for slightly shorter length of stay and reduced complexity of hospital admissions. These findings may or may not reflect a true benefit of the service and require further investigation. The DWS was established to improve quality of dementia care - reducing hospital admissions was never its sole purpose. More targeted interventions may be required to reduce hospital admissions for people with dementia.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Health Services Research and Policy |
Early online date | 23 Mar 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 23 Mar 2023 |
Research Groups and Themes
- NIHR ARC West
- HEHP@Bristol
Keywords
- evaluation of public health interventions
- Dementia Care
- avoidable admissions