Interventions to prevent obesity in school-aged children 6-18 years: An update of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis including studies from 2015–2021

Rebecca K. Hodder*, Kate M. O'Brien, Sasha Lorien, Luke Wolfenden, Theresa H.M. Moore, Alix Hall, Sze Lin Yoong, Carolyn Summerbell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

52 Citations (Scopus)
189 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Childhood obesity remains a global public health priority due to the enormous burden it generates. Recent surveillance data suggests there has been a sharp increase in the prevalence of childhood obesity during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Cochrane review of childhood obesity prevention interventions (0-18 years) updated to 2015 is the most rigorous and comprehensive review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic. A burgeoning number of high quality studies have been published since that are yet to be synthesised.

Methods: An update of the Cochrane systematic review was conducted to include RCT studies in school-aged children (6-18 years) published to 30 June 2021 that assessed effectiveness on child weight (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020218928). Available cost-effectiveness and adverse effect data were extracted. Intervention effects on body mass index (BMI) were synthesised in random effects meta-analyses by setting (school, after-school program, community, home), and meta-regression examined the association of study characteristics with intervention effect.

Findings: Meta-analysis of 140 of 195 included studies (183,063 participants) found a very small positive effect on body mass index for school-based studies (SMD -0·03, 95%CI -0·06,-0·01; trials = 93; participants = 131,443; moderate certainty evidence) but not after-school programs, community or home-based studies. Subgroup analysis by age (6-12 years; 13-18 years) found no differential effects in any setting. Meta-regression found no associations between study characteristics (including setting, income level) and intervention effect. Ten of 53 studies assessing adverse effects reported presence of an adverse event. Insufficient data was available to draw conclusions on cost-effectiveness.

Interpretation: This updated synthesis of obesity prevention interventions for children aged 6-18 years, found a small beneficial impact on child BMI for school-based obesity prevention interventions. A more comprehensive assessment of interventions is required to identify mechanisms of effective interventions to inform future obesity prevention public health policy, which may be particularly salient in for COVID-19 recovery planning.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101635
Number of pages41
JournaleClinicalMedicine
Volume54
Early online date19 Oct 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
RKH is supported by NHMRC Early Career Fellowship ( APP1160419 ). THMM was supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK. LW is funded by a NHMRC Investigator grant (APP1197022).

Funding Information:
We would like to greatly acknowledge Ms Debbie Booth from the University of Newcastle for conducting the updated search, and the authors of the previous versions of the Cochrane review of childhood obesity prevention interventions in children.17, RKH is supported by NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (APP1160419). THMM was supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK. LW is funded by a NHMRC Investigator grant (APP1197022).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)

Research Groups and Themes

  • NIHR ARC West

Keywords

  • Childhood obesity
  • Prevention
  • Public health
  • Systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interventions to prevent obesity in school-aged children 6-18 years: An update of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis including studies from 2015–2021'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this