Abstract
This article explores the implications of D v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2016] QB 161, a recent decision of the Court of Appeal in which two victims of a serial rapist successfully sued the Metropolitan police for investigative failures relying on Article 3 of the European Convention of Human Rights and the Human Rights Act 1998. The article reflects upon the extent to which English Courts are willing to recognise a duty to investigate within the wider context of civil claims against the police, particularly with regard to failures arising from the investigation of crimes of sexual and domestic violence. The comparative scope of tort and human rights claims is also considered along with the evolving jurisprudential trend towards drawing a firm line between the two kinds of claim.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 54–77 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Legal Studies |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 16 Oct 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- human rights
- tort
- rape
- police
- duty to investigate
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating rape: Human rights and police accountability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver