Investigation of genetic determinants of cognitive change in later life

Liam Mahedy, Emma L Anderson, Kate M Tilling, Zak Thornton, Andrew Elmore, Sandor Szalma, Arthur Simen, Meredith Culp, Stephen Zicha, Brian Harel, George Davey Smith, Erin N Smith, Lavinia Paternoster*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cognitive decline is a major health concern and identification of genes that may serve as drug targets to slow decline is important to adequately support an aging population. Whilst genetic studies of cross-sectional cognition have been carried out, cognitive change is less well-understood. Here, using data from the TOMMORROW trial, we investigate genetic associations with cognitive change in a cognitively normal older cohort. We conducted a genome-wide association study of trajectories of repeated cognitive measures (using generalised estimating equation (GEE) modelling) and tested associations with polygenic risk scores (PRS) of potential risk factors. We identified two genetic variants associated with change in attention domain scores, rs534221751 (p = 1 × 10−8 with slope 1) and rs34743896 (p = 5 × 10−10 with slope 2), implicating NCAM2 and CRIPT/ATP6V1E2 genes, respectively. We also found evidence for the association between an education PRS and baseline cognition (at >65 years of age), particularly in the language domain. We demonstrate the feasibility of conducting GWAS of cognitive change using GEE modelling and our results suggest that there may be novel genetic associations for cognitive change that have not previously been associated with cross-sectional cognition. We also show the importance of the education PRS on cognition much later in life. These findings warrant further investigation and demonstrate the potential value of using trial data and trajectory modelling to identify genetic variants associated with cognitive change.

Original languageEnglish
Article number31
Number of pages11
JournalTranslational Psychiatry
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors thank the participants of the TOMMORROW Trial. This study was funded through a collaboration with Takeda Development Center Americas. Takeda Development Center Americas had a role in the conduct of the study, data management, and analysis. LM, ELA, KT, ZAT, GDS and LP work in the Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol (MC_UU_00011/1 and MC_UU_00011/3). ELA is funded by a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/W011581/1). This study was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203315). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. ZAT receives funding from Southmead Hospital Charitable Funds: Brain Tumour Bank and Research Fund 8036.

Funding Information:
The authors thank the participants of the TOMMORROW Trial. This study was funded through a collaboration with Takeda Development Center Americas. Takeda Development Center Americas had a role in the conduct of the study, data management, and analysis. LM, ELA, KT, ZAT, GDS and LP work in the Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol (MC_UU_00011/1 and MC_UU_00011/3). ELA is funded by a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/W011581/1). This study was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203315). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. ZAT receives funding from Southmead Hospital Charitable Funds: Brain Tumour Bank and Research Fund 8036.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, The Author(s).

Research Groups and Themes

  • Bristol Population Health Science Institute

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigation of genetic determinants of cognitive change in later life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this