Is management of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms consistent? A questionnaire based survey

Eleanor Atkins, Nadeem A Mughal, Graeme K Ambler, Ranjeet Narlawar, Francesco Torella, George A Antoniou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

120 Downloads (Pure)


BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a relatively common presentation to the vascular specialist. Despite this there is little consensus on how to manage the often co-morbid group of patients. Recent advances in endovascular technology have led to the availability of multiple devices, many of which could be used to treat the same aneurysm. The aim of this study was to quantify this potential variability across vascular specialists from multiple countries.

METHODS: An online survey was emailed to members of the Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland (VSGBI), the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery (CSVS) and the Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery (ANZSVS). The survey presented a vignette of a 63-year-old woman with significant respiratory co-morbidity and a 54 mm juxtarenal AAA (7 mm neck). There were no other adverse morphological features for endovascular repair. The survey included images and questions related to management of the aneurysm.

RESULTS: 238 responses were received; 61 from ANZSVS, 65 from CSVS and 112 from VSGBI. VSGBI specialists were significantly more likely to continue surveillance than both ANZSVS (odds ratio (OR) 3.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61-7.65; p<0.001) and CSVS counterparts (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.29-5.47; p<0.01). ANZSVS specialists were significantly more likely to perform an endovascular repair than those from CSVS (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.50-7.40; p<0.01) and VSGBI (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.81-7.59; p<0.001). CSVS specialists were significantly more likely to manage the aneurysm with open surgery than colleagues from the VSGBI (OR 6.57, 95% CI 2.58-18.46; p<0.001) and ANZSVS (OR 7.18, 95% CI 2.22-30.79; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation in the management of a juxtarenal AAA between countries was observed. The same patient would be more likely to have an endovascular repair in Australia and New Zealand, open surgery in Canada and continuing surveillance in the UK and Ireland. This variation reflects the lack of long-term evidence and international consensus on the optimal management of complex AAA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-77
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Surgery
Issue number1
Early online date23 Jan 2018
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020


  • Abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • Aneurysm neck
  • Endovascular aneurysm repair
  • Endograft
  • Computed tomographic angiography

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is management of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms consistent? A questionnaire based survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this