Is nitazene-related mortality underestimated? Findings from an in vivo and ex vivo rat study and pharmacoepidemiological analysis of coroner-reported deaths

Shuoqi Chen, Daniyar Aldabergenov, Khalid S Alotaibi, Adam Holland, Robert Moore, Rebecca Wood, Simon Hudson, Holly Milton, Eleanor Menzies, Claire Parks, Alexander J Lawson, Magdalena Harris, Mervyn Singer, Alex Dyson, Caroline S Copeland*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Introduction:
Nitazenes are potent synthetic opioids. Following reports questioning their post-mortem stability, nitazene-related deaths may have been underestimated in the United Kingdom. We investigated this using a rat model and regional coronial data, and also present national pharmacoepidemiologic trends in nitazene-related deaths.

Method:
In vivo/ex vivo study: Anaesthetised Wistar rats (n = 12) received intravenous nitazene (metonitazene, N-desethyl isotonitazene, or N-pyrrolidino etonitazene). Rats were euthanised 15 min post-administration if cardiorespiratory arrest had not already occurred (n = 8). Blood and urine were collected, with repeat blood samples taken following cadaver refrigeration (4 °C) for one week. All samples were immediately frozen (−80 °C). Upon defrosting, half were analysed immediately by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy with half stored at 4 °C for 1 month before analysis.

Pharmacoepidemiology:
Nitazene deaths were extracted from the National Programme on Substance Use Mortality in March 2025 along with all deaths from the Birmingham & Solihull coronial area (2019–2023). Descriptive analyses were conducted along with exponential smoothing models to compare observed and forecasted deaths in Birmingham & Solihull in 2023.

Results:
In vivo/ex vivo study: A small fraction of the nitazene detected in the immediate post-mortem blood sample remained in the post-mortem day 7 blood sample that had been refrigerated for 1 month.

Pharmacoepidemiology:
In Birmingham and Solihull, non-nitazene drug deaths rose 33% in 2023 compared to 2019–2022 (predicted n = 107, actual n = 142). By March 2025, 285 deaths with nitazene detections were reported to the National Programme on Substance Use Mortality, with small clusters in 2021 (n = 23) and 2022 (n = 15) before markedly increasing in 2023 (n = 131). Twelve nitazenes were detected with the predominant nitazene shifting over time (2021: isotonitazene; 2022: N-pyrrolidino etonitazene; 2023: N-desethyl isotonitazene). Coroners deemed nitazenes causative in 90% of cases (n = 256/285).

Conclusions:
Nitazene-related deaths have increased in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, and may have been underestimated due to post-mortem instability. Urgent public health action is required to reduce nitazene-related harms.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages13
JournalClinical Toxicology
Early online date8 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Feb 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright;
© 2026 The author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Groups and Themes

  • TARG-otherdrugs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is nitazene-related mortality underestimated? Findings from an in vivo and ex vivo rat study and pharmacoepidemiological analysis of coroner-reported deaths'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this