Is the Senior Managers and Certification Regime Changing Banking for Good?

Eleanore Hickman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2016 the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR) came into being. It sought to improve banking culture through the attribution of responsibility to individuals and to provide clarity on required conduct standards. It marked a shift away from collective responsibility and towards more individual accountability that had been so lacking following the financial crisis of 2007/08. Its scope is expansive, including not just board executives but also senior managers. In this paper, I question whether there are indications the SMCR is achieving its objective of ‘changing banking for good’. I do this by analysing the design of the SMCR and its application in practice as well as the meaning and regulatability of culture. I conclude that though the SMCR could make strides towards better banking culture, its potential is being curtailed by inconsistent messaging and irresolute application.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1440-1462
JournalModern Law Review
Volume85
Issue number6
Early online date25 Jul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is the Senior Managers and Certification Regime Changing Banking for Good?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this