Skip to content

Is There a Baseflow Budyko Curve?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2838-2855
Number of pages18
JournalWater Resources Research
Issue number4
Early online date8 Apr 2019
DateAccepted/In press - 8 Mar 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print - 8 Apr 2019
DatePublished (current) - 8 Apr 2019


There is no general theory to explain differences in baseflow between catchments, despite evidence that it is mainly controlled by climate and landscape. One hypothesis is that baseflow fraction (the ratio between baseflow and precipitation) can be primarily attributed to the aridity index (the ratio between potential evapotranspiration and precipitation), i.e. that there is a "baseflow Budyko curve". Comparing catchment data from the US and the UK shows, however, that aridity is not always a good predictor of baseflow fraction. We use the revised Ponce-Shetty annual water balance model to show that there is no single "baseflow Budyko curve", but rather a continuum of curves emerging from a more universal model that incorporates both climate and landscape factors. In humid catchments, baseflow fraction is highly variable due to variations in a catchment’s wetting potential, a parameter that describes catchment storage capacity. In arid catchments, vaporisation lim its baseflow generation which leads to lower variability in baseflow fraction. Generally,when the magnitude of precipitation is important, the aridity index only partly explains baseflow response. Adapting the model to explain variability of the baseflow index (the ratio between baseflow and total streamflow) shows that the aridity index is generally a poor predictor of baseflow index. While the wetting potentials and other parameters are obtained by fitting the Ponce-Shetty model to annual catchment data, their links to physical properties remain to be explored. This currently limits the model’s applicability to gauged catchments with sufficiently long records.

    Research areas

  • catchment hydrology, Budyko framework, baseflow, annual water balance

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via AGU at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 3.21 MB, PDF document

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via AGU at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 2.7 MB, PDF document


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups