SIHGT and SUNOD: the role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams

CR Frankish, EL Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Misperception of nonwords created by adjacent letter transpositions (TL anagrams) indicates that word recognition is based on an orthographic matching process that is tolerant of minor positional errors in the letter sequence. We report five experiments that investigate the extent to which the misperception of TL anagrams is influenced by orthographic and phonological properties of the letter string. The first two experiments demonstrate that in a lexical decision task with masked target displays, false positive responses are more likely for unpronounceable than for pronounceable TL items. In Experiment 3 this effect was observed in an identification task as a trade-off between lexical responses and correct identification. A fourth experiment provided additional evidence that these effects are mediated by phonological rather than orthographic processing. This interpretation was strengthened by a final experiment showing that dyslexic participants did not show the pronounceability effect in lexical decision. These results are interpreted in terms of inhibition of lexical responses to TL anagrams by incompatible phonological representations of the letter string.
Translated title of the contributionSIHGT and SUNOD: the role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189 - 211
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume56 (2)
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2007

Bibliographical note

Publisher: Elsevier

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '<i>SIHGT</i> and <i>SUNOD</i>: the role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this