Abstract
In this article, I examine the work of the 1992-1993 Labour party trade union links review group. I ask whether the measures it proposed amounted to a new, durable settlement which governed internal relationships within the party. I detail disagreements amongst trade unions over the format that parliamentary selections should take; I evaluate the demands for reform of the party-union link; I ask whether support for reform and for OMOV was falling in the early 1990s; I consider whether unions launched a ‘no say no pay campaign’ with regard to the Labour party; I assess how much restraint was demonstrated at this time by Labour’s affiliated unions; and I consider what might have been at stake in these debates more generally. I conclude that there was considerable antagonism in party-union relations during the early 1990s and that the work of the review group did not amount to an enduring settlement
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 21 |
| Number of pages | 46 |
| Journal | Industrial Relations Journal |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 19 Feb 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 9 Mar 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Labour party
- trade unions
- modernisation
- parliamentary selections
- leadership elections
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'John Smith's settlement? The work of the 1992-1993 Labour Party Trade Union Links Review Group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Emeritus Professor Mark Wickham-Jones
- School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies - Emeritus Professor of Political Science
Person: Honorary and Visiting Academic
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver