Sang Hyun Lee’s account of Jonathan Edwards’s ontology has become the benchmark of many recent discussions of Edwards’s thought. In this paper, I argue that this Lee interpretation is flawed in several crucial respects. In place of Lee’s understanding of Edwards I offer an account of Edwards’s work according to which Edwards is an idealist-occasionalist, but not an advocate of a purely dispositional ontology of creation.
|Translated title of the contribution||'Jonathan Edwards's Ontology: A Critique of Sang Hyun Lee's Dispositional Account of Edwardsian Metaphysics’|
|Pages (from-to)||1 - 20|
|Number of pages||20|
|Publication status||Published - Jan 2010|