Judging a Hereford hanging: Agnes Glover v. Walter Devereux, William Herbert and others (1457)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

This article considers an appeal of homicide brought by the widow of a hanged Hereford man, the background to which was what R.A. Griffiths calls the ‘forcible arrangement’ by powerful men of Herefordshire and the Welsh marches of the trial and execution of those said to have been guilty of murdering Watkin Vaughan of Bredwardine. While this incident has been considered in the context of disorder perpetrated in England, Wales and the Marches by particular families and affinities, and the efficiency or otherwise of royal justice in the mid-fifteenth century, some of its legal aspects have not been explored, and, in particular, it has generally been overlooked that the case was deemed worthy of a report, so that its essentials could be preserved for the instruction of common lawyers (YB Pasch. 35 Hen. VI f. 57b). This article draws on information from this Year Book report and the records of the King’s Bench, and argues that limitations on existing legal processes should form part of historians’ consideration of criminal justice in the mid-fifteenth century.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages17
JournalMidland History
Volume45
Issue number1
Early online date8 Jan 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Jan 2020

Structured keywords

  • LAW Centre for Law and History Research

Keywords

  • Hereford
  • medieval criminal law
  • Welsh borders
  • execution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Judging a Hereford hanging: Agnes Glover v. Walter Devereux, William Herbert and others (1457)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this