Juxtapositioning Populism and Professionalism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)


By denigrating expertise and challenging the value of evidence-based statements, advice and policies, populism challenges professions and professionalism. Arguably it is imperative for the professions to meet the challenge: but how? Here we provide an approach by juxtaposing populism and professionalism; two complex, ambiguous and contested phenomena with different and rarely connected literatures. Ontic and ontological definitions of each are compared and a method is developed for juxtaposing elements of their ontic definitions. Elements compared are: Manichean distinctions; disintermediation; morality v. ethics; emotionalism v. rationalism; and transparency. These are used to further understanding of both populism and professionalism and to provide insights into different ways the challenge of populism can be met: fighting it head on, adjusting to reduce the import of criticisms and perhaps controversially, adopting or at least adapting certain populist elements.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalProfessions and Professionalism
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2019


  • Populism, professionalism, disintermediation, morality, emotionalism, transparency, juxtapositioning


Dive into the research topics of 'Juxtapositioning Populism and Professionalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this