Kant, Moral Overdemandingness and Self-Scrutiny

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
127 Downloads (Pure)


This paper contributes to the debate about how the overdemandingness objection applies to Kant’s ethics. I first look at the versions of the overdemandingness objections Kant himself levels against other ethicists and ethical principles and I discuss in what sense he acknowledges overdemandingness as a problem. Then I argue that, according to Kant’s own standards, introspection about the moral worthiness of one’s actions can constitute forms of moral overdemandingness. Self-scrutiny and Kant’s well-known claim that we can never be certain that we acted for the right reason jeopardize agents’ deserved happiness. Furthermore, self-scrutiny can constitute an activity Kant himself criticizes under the labels of “micrology” and “fantastic virtue”. The demandingness of critical self-scrutiny has not yet received due attention in the overdemandingness debate since this debate is focused on duties we have towards others.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
Early online date8 Aug 2019
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Aug 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Kant, Moral Overdemandingness and Self-Scrutiny'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this