Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Large-scale cross-societal examination of real- and minimal-group biases

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

    Abstract

    Biases in favor of culturally prevalent social ingroups are ubiquitous, but random assignment to arbitrary experimentally created social groups is also sufficient to create ingroup biases (i.e., the minimal group effect; MGE). The extent to which ingroup bias arises from specific social contexts versus more general psychological tendencies remains unclear. This registered report focuses on three questions. First, how culturally prevalent is the MGE? Second, how do critical cultural and individual factors moderate its strength? Third, does the MGE meaningfully relate to culturally salient real-world ingroup biases? We compare the MGE to bias in favor of a family member (first cousin) and a national ingroup member. We propose to recruit a sample of > 200 participants in each of > 50 nations to examine these questions and advance our understanding of the psychological foundations and cultural prevalence of ingroup bias.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages46
    JournalPsyArXiv
    DOIs
    Publication statusSubmitted - 5 Jun 2024

    Keywords

    • Intergroup processes
    • prejudice and discrimination
    • in-group biases
    • minimal groups

    Cite this