TY - JOUR
T1 - Large-scale evaluation of outcomes after a genetic diagnosis in children with severe developmental disorders
AU - The DDD study
AU - Copeland, Harriet
AU - Low, Karen J.
AU - Wynn, Sarah L.
AU - Ahmed, Ayesha
AU - Arthur, Victoria
AU - Balasubramanian, Meena
AU - Bennett, Katya
AU - Berg, Jonathan
AU - Bertoli, Marta
AU - Bryson, Lisa
AU - Bucknall, Catrin
AU - Campbell, Jamie
AU - Chandler, Kate
AU - Chauhan, Jaynee
AU - Clarkson, Amy
AU - Coles, Rachel
AU - Conti, Hector
AU - Costello, Philandra
AU - Coupar, Tessa
AU - Craig, Amy
AU - Dean, John
AU - Dillon, Amy
AU - Dixit, Abhijit
AU - Drew, Kathryn
AU - Eason, Jacqueline
AU - Forzano, Francesca
AU - Foulds, Nicola
AU - Gardham, Alice
AU - Newbury-Ecob, Ruth
AU - Smithson, Sarah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/12/27
Y1 - 2024/12/27
N2 - Purpose
We sought to evaluate outcomes for clinical management after a genetic diagnosis from the Deciphering Developmental Disorders study.
Methods
Individuals in the Deciphering Developmental Disorders study who had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic genotype in the DECIPHER database were selected for inclusion (n = 5010). Clinical notes from regional clinical genetics services notes were reviewed to assess predefined clinical outcomes relating to interventions, prenatal choices, and information provision.
Results
Outcomes were recorded for 4237 diagnosed probands (85% of those eligible) from all 24 recruiting centers across the United Kingdom and Ireland. Clinical management was reported to have changed in 28% of affected individuals. Where individual-level interventions were recorded, additional diagnostic or screening tests were started in 903 (21%) probands through referral to a range of different clinical specialties, and stopped or avoided in a further 26 (0.6%). Disease-specific treatment was started in 85 (2%) probands, including seizure-control medications and dietary supplements, and contra-indicated medications were stopped or avoided in a further 20 (0.5%). The option of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing was discussed with 1204 (28%) families, despite the relatively advanced age of the parents at the time of diagnosis. Importantly, condition-specific information or literature was given to 3214 (76%) families, and 880 (21%) were involved in family support groups. In the most common condition (KBG syndrome; 79 [2%] probands), clinical interventions only partially reflected the temporal development of phenotypes, highlighting the importance of consensus management guidelines and patient support groups.
Conclusion
Our results underscore the importance of achieving a clinico-molecular diagnosis to ensure timely onward referral of patients, enabling appropriate care and anticipatory surveillance, and for accessing relevant patient support groups.
AB - Purpose
We sought to evaluate outcomes for clinical management after a genetic diagnosis from the Deciphering Developmental Disorders study.
Methods
Individuals in the Deciphering Developmental Disorders study who had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic genotype in the DECIPHER database were selected for inclusion (n = 5010). Clinical notes from regional clinical genetics services notes were reviewed to assess predefined clinical outcomes relating to interventions, prenatal choices, and information provision.
Results
Outcomes were recorded for 4237 diagnosed probands (85% of those eligible) from all 24 recruiting centers across the United Kingdom and Ireland. Clinical management was reported to have changed in 28% of affected individuals. Where individual-level interventions were recorded, additional diagnostic or screening tests were started in 903 (21%) probands through referral to a range of different clinical specialties, and stopped or avoided in a further 26 (0.6%). Disease-specific treatment was started in 85 (2%) probands, including seizure-control medications and dietary supplements, and contra-indicated medications were stopped or avoided in a further 20 (0.5%). The option of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing was discussed with 1204 (28%) families, despite the relatively advanced age of the parents at the time of diagnosis. Importantly, condition-specific information or literature was given to 3214 (76%) families, and 880 (21%) were involved in family support groups. In the most common condition (KBG syndrome; 79 [2%] probands), clinical interventions only partially reflected the temporal development of phenotypes, highlighting the importance of consensus management guidelines and patient support groups.
Conclusion
Our results underscore the importance of achieving a clinico-molecular diagnosis to ensure timely onward referral of patients, enabling appropriate care and anticipatory surveillance, and for accessing relevant patient support groups.
U2 - 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101864
DO - 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101864
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 39822267
SN - 2949-7744
VL - 2
JO - Genetics in Medicine Open
JF - Genetics in Medicine Open
M1 - 101864
ER -