Abstract
The state of centre-periphery relations reflects on the “depth” of democratic consolidation. This is tested by applying the territorial dimension of democratisation, a neglected theme in regime change studies, utilising the “partial regimes” approach, one especially justified with regard to regions disaffected with regime change. This approach is applied to the Latvian region of Latgale with a four-point analysis, looking in turn at the structural/institutional, intermediary actors, the socio-political and the external. Contrary to received opinion, it is found that, despite a pattern of socio-economic deprivation and continuing resentment towards Riga, systemic loyalty and societal stability there are fairly strong, that centre-periphery relations are essentially centripetal and that counter pressures from neighbouring Russia have had a limited effect.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 194-216 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | East European Politics |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 7 Apr 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 7 Apr 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- democratic consolidation
- frontier regions
- Latgale
- post-Soviet Latvian democracy
- Russia factor
- territorial dimension of democratisation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Latgale and Latvia’s post-Soviet democracy: the territorial dimension of regime consolidation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver