Skip to content

Law, ethics and end-of-life care: the policy and practice interface in England

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)213-218
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Palliative Nursing
Volume23
Issue number5
Early online date26 May 2017
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 19 Jan 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 26 May 2017
DatePublished (current) - May 2017

Abstract

Palliative care aims neither to hasten nor postpone death but instead offers support to people with advancing, incurable somatic illness (WHO, 2002). At the same time, individual nurses hold a wide range of views on euthanasia and end-of-life care, whilst the care-giving in clinical practice occurs in a social context in accordance with local and national policy (Quaghebeur et al 2009). Policy and practice must conform to the law, which defines liability in the end-of-life phase. However, as this paper highlights, the law has primarily focused on the criminalisation of euthanasia and less on the complex issues involved in the ‘good death’ concept. As a result, contemporary policy that helps to shape and direct end-of-life care faces a tension between end-of-life liability and the way in which palliative care is developing (LACDP, 2014).

The authors of this paper are not suggesting as a response to this tension that euthanasia should be legalised nor equating it with a 'good death'. The central argument from the authors of this paper is different: that for end-of-life care to develop and progress, practice has to interface with law and policy to a greater extent. A better interface will facilitate policy and law to be shaped by the complexity and demands of practice decision-making, so allowing a better understanding of what the end-of-life process entails. This is not to suggest that all end-of-life issues should be driven singularly by palliative care practice, but that a better future for the end-of-life entails the linking of law, policy and practice. Palliative care nurses have an obvious interest in the processes aimed at improving the interface between law, ethics and public policy. The approach of this paper is significant at the current time when palliative care policy is being actively debated (LACDP, 2014; NCPC, 2014, NICE 2015) with issues of communication between end-of-life care staff and patients as central (PHSO 2015; RCP, 2016).

    Research areas

  • Palliative Care, Euthanasia, Ethics of care, end-of-life care

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via MA Healthcare Ltd. at http://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/10.12968/ijpn.2017.23.5.213. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 201 KB, PDF document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups