Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Lay community health worker-led care with mobile decision support for uncontrolled hypertension: a cluster-randomized trial

Felix Gerber*, Giuliana Sanchez-Samaniego, Ravi Gupta, Thabo Ishmael Lejone, Thesar Tahirsylaj, Fabian Raeber, Mamakhala Chitja, Malebona Mathulise, Thuso Kabi, Mosoetsi Mokaeane, Malehloa Maphenchane, Manthabiseng Molulela, Makhebe Khomolishoele, Mota Mota, Sesale Masike, Matumaole Bane, Manthati Mofokeng, Mamoronts'ane Pauline Sematle, Retselisitsoe Makabateng, Madavida MphunyaneLebohang Sao, Mosa Tlahali, Malitaba Litaba, Dave Brian Basler, Kevin Kindler, Irene Ayakaka, Pauline Grimm, Thilo Burkard, Frédérique Chammartin, Alain Amstutz, Niklaus Daniel Labhardt*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Access to hypertension care remains insufficient, particularly in remote rural areas in resource-limited settings. Community health workers (CHWs), lay providers living in the communities they serve, may help close this gap, but the effectiveness and safety of lay CHW-led hypertension care-including independent initiation and titration of medication-remain uncertain. We conducted a 1:1 cluster-randomized trial nested within the Community-Based Chronic Care Lesotho (ComBaCaL) cohort study in 103 rural villages in Lesotho. Following community-based hypertension screening, 547 nonpregnant adults with blood pressure (BP) ≥140/90 mm Hg were enrolled (274 control and 273 intervention). In intervention clusters, lay CHWs independently prescribed and titrated a fixed-dose combination of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide, guided by a mobile clinical decision support system. In control clusters, participants were referred to health facilities for standard care. The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness and safety of lay CHW-led care, with the primary outcome defined as BP <140/90 mm Hg at 12 months. In the intention-to-treat analysis (543 participants with 4 exclusions owing to intercurrent pregnancy), BP control was achieved by 156/271 (58%) versus 130/272 (48%) in intervention and control arms, respectively (adjusted odds ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.29, P = 0.046). A predefined complete case analysis yielded consistent results. No relevant differences in safety outcomes were observed. Among people with uncontrolled hypertension, lay CHW-led, CDSS-supported care was safe and more effective than referral to facility-based professional care. These findings support expanding first-line hypertension management by lay CHWs in remote, resource-limited settings.

Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT05684055 .
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)915-923
Number of pages9
JournalNature Medicine
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Feb 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lay community health worker-led care with mobile decision support for uncontrolled hypertension: a cluster-randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this