Abstract
The term ‘left behind’ has come to connote political disaffection, alongside social and spatial inequalities in wealth and opportunity. Yet the term is also widely contested, often prioritising a regional and economic perspective at the expense of a more local and nuanced approach. In response, we argue that neighbourhood context is integral to understanding and identifying ‘left behind’ places. Building a neighbourhood classification of ‘left behindness’ for England, we evaluate the extent to which the neighbourhood trajectory contributes to our understanding of a range of multidimensional individual-level outcomes. Our findings reveal a geography of neighbourhoods that are systematically disadvantaged over time, concentrated in major urban conurbations, and post-industrial and coastal towns. The magnitude and impact is highlighted through poorer economic, health, social and political outcomes for those living in ‘left behind’ areas.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e12583 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | The Geographical Journal |
Volume | 190 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 8 May 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 5 Nov 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Authors. The Geographical Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).
Research Groups and Themes
- Poverty
- Bristol Poverty Institute
- Jean Golding
Keywords
- Inequality
- Left behind
- Neighbourhoods
- Sequence Analysis
- Multi-level modelling