‘Left Behind’ neighbourhoods in England: where they are and why they matter

Vikki Houlden, Caitlin Robinson*, Rachel Franklin, Francisco Rowe, Andy Pike

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The term ‘left behind’ has come to connote political disaffection, alongside social and spatial inequalities in wealth and opportunity. Yet the term is also widely contested, often prioritising a regional and economic perspective at the expense of a more local and nuanced approach. In response, we argue that neighbourhood context is integral to understanding and identifying ‘left behind’ places. Building a neighbourhood classification of ‘left behindness’ for England, we evaluate the extent to which the neighbourhood trajectory contributes to our understanding of a range of multidimensional individual-level outcomes. Our findings reveal a geography of neighbourhoods that are systematically disadvantaged over time, concentrated in major urban conurbations, and post-industrial and coastal towns. The magnitude and impact is highlighted through poorer economic, health, social and political outcomes for those living in ‘left behind’ areas.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12583
Number of pages20
JournalThe Geographical Journal
Volume190
Issue number4
Early online date8 May 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. The Geographical Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).

Research Groups and Themes

  • Poverty
  • Bristol Poverty Institute
  • Jean Golding

Keywords

  • Inequality
  • Left behind
  • Neighbourhoods
  • Sequence Analysis
  • Multi-level modelling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘Left Behind’ neighbourhoods in England: where they are and why they matter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this