Liability threshold for damages in public procurement: The EFTA Court’s Fosen-Linjen Saga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

78 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this case comment, I explore the two EFTA Court Judgments in the Fosen-Linjen saga and their opposing views on the interaction between EU/EEA rules on procurement remedies and the more general principle of State liability for breaches of EU/EEA law. I review the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and, in particular, the perceived inconsistencies between the two 2010 Judgments in Strabag and Spijker, which featured very prominently in the legal arguments submitted to the EFTA Court in both Fosen-Linjen cases. I also use the benchmark of the UK Supreme Court's Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Judgment to support the view that Spijker reflects the correct understanding of EU/EEA law and that there should be no further debate about it. I submit that the Court of Justice of the European Union would be well-advised to (re)confirm the position enshrined in Spijker at the earliest opportunity, to avoid any perpetuation of this debate in the context of EU/EEA public procurement law.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)511–521
Number of pages11
JournalNorthern Ireland Legal Quarterly
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 21 Oct 2019

Structured keywords

  • LAW Centre for Law and Enterprise

Keywords

  • public procurement
  • public enforcement
  • private enforcement
  • effectiveness
  • causation
  • simple breach
  • sufficiently serious breach
  • State liability
  • damages
  • liability

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Liability threshold for damages in public procurement: The EFTA Court’s Fosen-Linjen Saga'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this