Abstract
An ontology of powers—essentially dispositional natural properties—has recently become popular, and consequently philosophers have sought to apply this ontol- ogy to a number of problems and areas outside fundamental metaphysics, such as those concerning causation, intentionality, and free will. In this paper I warn against over-extending the case for a powers ontology: the powers ontology cannot answer typical questions outside fundamental metaphysics. I suggest that proposals that attempt to do this suffer from a conflation of ‘power’ and ‘disposition’ or from an abuse of metaphor.
| Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism |
| Editors | Ruth Groff, John Greco |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Pages | 25-47 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver