Abstract
PURPOSE The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Item Library is an interactive online platform currently composed of 950 unique items (questions) derived from 67 patient-reportedoutcome (PRO) questionnaires. PROs complement clinician adverse event (AE) reporting classifications like the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). This work aims to create a standardized framework using the CTCAE to systematically classify symptomatic AEs from the EORTC Item Library through linking individual items to corresponding AEs.
METHODS The EORTC Item Library items were searched for within the CTCAE (v5.0) and linked to an AE if they were described within the AE’s title, description, or grading. Symptoms described in EORTC items but not located in the CTCAE were coded as missing symptoms. Other nonsymptom EORTC items, not described within the CTCAE were assigned a non-CTCAE descriptive classification. Further descriptive codes (eg, multiple issues) were allocated to enable descriptive analysis. Two raters independently coded 26.2% (n 5 249) of the items. The remaining 701 items were coded by one rater and verified by the second, followed by discussion with two additional raters to reach consensus.
RESULTS Overall, 625 (65.8%) EORTC items were linked to 208 different AEs. Three hundred sixty-nine items provide information about non-CTCAE cancer–related issues and were categorized into seven descriptiveclassifications, includin body image; emotional impact of a symptom, diagnosis, or treatment; global health andquality of life; and impact on life and daily activities. Inter-rater agreement for independent coding was 79.1%.Bowel urgency and tenesmus were identified as missing symptoms in CTCAEv5.0.
CONCLUSION The EORTC Item Library provides considerable coverage of CTCAE toxicities, along with other complementary issues important to patients with cancer. Using the CTCAE clinical framework to classify symptomatic PRO items may facilitate PRO selection and use in clinical trials and routine care.
METHODS The EORTC Item Library items were searched for within the CTCAE (v5.0) and linked to an AE if they were described within the AE’s title, description, or grading. Symptoms described in EORTC items but not located in the CTCAE were coded as missing symptoms. Other nonsymptom EORTC items, not described within the CTCAE were assigned a non-CTCAE descriptive classification. Further descriptive codes (eg, multiple issues) were allocated to enable descriptive analysis. Two raters independently coded 26.2% (n 5 249) of the items. The remaining 701 items were coded by one rater and verified by the second, followed by discussion with two additional raters to reach consensus.
RESULTS Overall, 625 (65.8%) EORTC items were linked to 208 different AEs. Three hundred sixty-nine items provide information about non-CTCAE cancer–related issues and were categorized into seven descriptiveclassifications, includin body image; emotional impact of a symptom, diagnosis, or treatment; global health andquality of life; and impact on life and daily activities. Inter-rater agreement for independent coding was 79.1%.Bowel urgency and tenesmus were identified as missing symptoms in CTCAEv5.0.
CONCLUSION The EORTC Item Library provides considerable coverage of CTCAE toxicities, along with other complementary issues important to patients with cancer. Using the CTCAE clinical framework to classify symptomatic PRO items may facilitate PRO selection and use in clinical trials and routine care.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 3770 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Oncology |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 32 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 16 Aug 2022 |
