Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

Julian H Elliott, Tari Turner, Ornella Clavisi, James Thomas, Julian P T Higgins, Chris Mavergames, Russell L Gruen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

150 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current difficulties in keeping systematic reviews up to date leads to considerable inaccuracy, hampering the translation of knowledge into action. Incremental advances in conventional review updating are unlikely to lead to substantial improvements in review currency. A new approach is needed. We propose living systematic review as a contribution to evidence synthesis that combines currency with rigour to enhance the accuracy and utility of health evidence. Living systematic reviews are high quality, up-to-date online summaries of health research, updated as new research becomes available, and enabled by improved production efficiency and adherence to the norms of scholarly communication. Together with innovations in primary research reporting and the creation and use of evidence in health systems, living systematic review contributes to an emerging evidence ecosystem.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e1001603
JournalPLoS Medicine
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Elliott, J. H., Turner, T., Clavisi, O., Thomas, J., Higgins, J. P. T., Mavergames, C., & Gruen, R. L. (2014). Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap. PLoS Medicine, 11(2), e1001603. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603