Long-term survey of laryngoplasty and ventriculocordectomy in an older, mixed-breed population of 200 horses. Part 2: Owner's assessment of the value of surgery

PM Dixon, BC McGorum, DI Railton, C Hawe, WH Tremaine, K Dacre, J McCann

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

    45 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Reasons for performing study: There is continuing debate on the clinical benefit of laryngoplasty (LP) in the treatment of equine laryngeal paralysis. In particular, there is little information available on the clinical value of this surgery in older horses, in non-Thoroughbreds or in sports or pleasure horses; nor on the relationship between the degree of LP abduction achieved and the clinical value of LP.

    Objectives: To evaluate the owner's assessment of the value of LP(and combined ventriculocordectomy) in an older, mixed breed and mixed workload population of horses and to also assess the relationship between the degree of LP abduction present and the clinical value of this surgery.

    Methods: A study (1986–1998) of 200 horses of mixed breed and workload, median age 6 years (prospective 136 cases and retrospective 64 cases) undergoing LP and ventriculocordectomy was undertaken. The degree of laryngoplasty abduction achieved and maintained was semi-quantitatively evaluated using a 5-grade system.

    Results: A survey of 198 owners, a median of 19 months after LP surgery, showed that 91% of cases had returned to full work and 3% to reduced work, including 95% of horses with good (Grade 2) laryngoplasty abduction at 6 weeks after surgery, 91% with moderate (Grade 3) abduction, 88% of cases with minsimal (Grade 4) abduction and just 25% of cases with total loss of surgical abduction (Grade 5).

    Once back in work, 73% of cases were reported to make no abnormal exercise-related noises (‘noises’) at exercise, with reduced ‘noises’ reported in some of the 21% of horses that still made ‘noises’. In the other 6% of cases, owners were unsure if ‘noises’ were present. The absence or presence of ‘noises’ once back at work correlated significantly with the degree of surgical arytenoid abduction present at 6 weeks after LP. Once back in work, ‘noises’ were less commonly detected in sports and pleasure horses (absent in 76% of cases) than in racehorses (absent in 60%) of cases.

    Exercise performance following surgery was reported to be markedly increased in 75% of cases, with 10% showing no difference in exercise performance, 3% showing worse performance, and owners unsure of any effect on exercise performance in 13% of cases. Improved work was reported in 70% of sports and pleasure horses and in 67% of racehorses.

    Overall, 86% of owners believed LP was worthwhile, 7% believed it was not worthwhile and 6% were unsure of its value. Surgery was reported to be of most benefit to sports horses (e.g. reported worthwhile for 100% of show jumpers) and of least benefit to National Hunt (long distance) racehorses where 71% of owners believed it to be worthwhile.

    Conclusions and potential relevance: Most horse-owners believe that LP and combined ventriculocordectomy are of clinical value, especially in sports and pleasure horses. Large scale physiological studies on clinical cases, pre- and post operatively, are required to examine more critically the value of such surgery.
    Translated title of the contributionLong-term survey of laryngoplasty and ventriculocordectomy in an older, mixed-breed population of 200 horses. Part 2: Owner's assessment of the value of surgery
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)397-401
    Number of pages5
    JournalEquine Veterinary Journal
    Volume35
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2003

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher: British Equine Veterinary Association

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term survey of laryngoplasty and ventriculocordectomy in an older, mixed-breed population of 200 horses. Part 2: Owner's assessment of the value of surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this