Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Long‐distance Friends and Collective Action in Fisheries Management

  • Kristopher M. Smith
  • , Anne C. Pisor*
  • , Bertha Aron
  • , Kasambo Bernard
  • , Paschal Fimbo
  • , Haji Machano
  • , Rose Kimesera
  • , Jason Rubens
  • , Lorna Slade
  • , Jumanne Sobo
  • , Ali Thani
  • , Monique Borgerhoff Mulder
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Much received wisdom in the conservation literature is that individual connections across community boundaries undercut natural resource management. However, when multiple communities access the same resource, these long‐distance relationships could generate interdependence and trust to motivate engagement in collective action to manage the resource. To test this, we interviewed 1317 people in 28 fishing villages in Tanzania about their participation in managing open‐access fisheries and their social relationships in each village accessing the fishery. People with more friends in other villages trusted more people in those villages and were more likely to participate in collective action to manage the shared fishery, such as reporting others for destructive fishing practices. These results show that long‐distance relationships may be a useful foundation upon which to build conservation efforts that cross community boundaries and bolster sustainable resource use.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13073
Number of pages8
JournalConservation Letters
Volume18
Issue number1
Early online date5 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keywords

  • natural resource management
  • between‐community collective action
  • fisheries
  • participatory co‐management
  • long‐distance relationships

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long‐distance Friends and Collective Action in Fisheries Management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this