Loss and Damage and limits to adaptation: recent IPCC insights and implications for climate science and policy

R. Mechler*, C. Singh, K. Ebi, R. Djalante, A. Thomas, R. James, P. Tschakert, M. Wewerinke-Singh, T. Schinko, D. Ley, J. Nalau, L. M. Bouwer, C. Huggel, S. Huq, J. Linnerooth-Bayer, S. Surminski, P. Pinho, R. Jones, E. Boyd, A. Revi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

86 Citations (Scopus)
40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recent evidence shows that climate change is leading to irreversible and existential impacts on vulnerable communities and countries across the globe. Among other effects, this has given rise to public debate and engagement around notions of climate crisis and emergency. The Loss and Damage (L&D) policy debate has emphasized these aspects over the last three decades. Yet, despite institutionalization through an article on L&D by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in the Paris Agreement, the debate has remained vague, particularly with reference to its remit and relationship to adaptation policy and practice. Research has recently made important strides forward in terms of developing a science perspective on L&D. This article reviews insights derived from recent publications by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and others, and presents the implications for science and policy. Emerging evidence on hard and soft adaptation limits in certain systems, sectors and regions holds the potential to further build momentum for climate policy to live up to the Paris ambition of stringent emission reductions and to increase efforts to support the most vulnerable. L&D policy may want to consider actions to extend soft adaptation limits and spur transformational, that is, non-standard risk management and adaptation, so that limits are not breached. Financial, technical, and legal support would be appropriate for instances where hard limits are transgressed. Research is well positioned to further develop robust evidence on critical and relevant risks at scale in the most vulnerable countries and communities, as well as options to reduce barriers and limits to adaptation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1245-1251
Number of pages7
JournalSustainability Science
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Open access funding provided by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). Thomas Schinko and Reinhard Mechler were supported by funding from the Austrian Climate and Energy Fund (Austrian Climate Research Program (ACRP), project TransLoss, project number B960205. Reinhard Mechler gratefully acknowledges funding by the Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance.

Funding Information:
Open access funding provided by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). Thomas Schinko and Reinhard Mechler were supported by funding from the Austrian Climate and Energy Fund (Austrian Climate Research Program (ACRP), project TransLoss, project number B960205. Reinhard Mechler gratefully acknowledges funding by the Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Climate risk
  • Limits to adaptation
  • Loss and Damage
  • Transformation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Loss and Damage and limits to adaptation: recent IPCC insights and implications for climate science and policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this