Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2012, hepatitis B virus (HBV) testing of people born in a country with a prevalence of ≥2% was recommended in the UK. Implementation of this recommendation requires an understanding of prior HBV testing practice and coverage, for which there are limited data.
AIM: To estimate the proportion of migrants tested for HBV and explore GP testing practices and barriers to testing.
DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional study of (a) migrants for whom testing was recommended under English national guidance, living in Bristol, and registered with a GP in 2006-2013, and (b) GPs practising in Bristol.
METHOD: NHS patient demographic data and HBV laboratory surveillance data were linked. A person was defined as 'HBV-tested' if a laboratory result was available. An online GP survey was undertaken, using a structured questionnaire.
RESULTS: Among 82 561 migrants for whom HBV testing was recommended, 9627 (12%) were 'HBV-tested'. The HBV testing coverage was: Eastern Africa 20%; Western Africa 15%; South Eastern Asia 9%; Eastern Asia 5%. Of 19 GPs, the majority did not use guidelines to inform HBV testing in migrants and did not believe routine testing of migrants was indicated; 12/17 GPs stated that workload and lack of human, and financial resources were the most significant barriers to increased testing.
CONCLUSION: The majority of migrants to a multicultural UK city from medium-/high-prevalence regions have no evidence of HBV testing. Much greater support for primary care in the UK and increased GP awareness of national guidance are required to achieve adherence to current testing guidance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e382-e391 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | British Journal of General Practice |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue number | 647 |
| Early online date | 26 May 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2016 |
Keywords
- Cross-Sectional Studies
- Hepatitis B
- Transients and Migrants
- Diagnosis
- General Practice
- United Kingdom
Access to Document
- Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)
This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via RCGP at https://bjgp.org/content/66/647/e382 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
- Supplementary information PDF Table 1
This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via RCGP at https://bjgp.org/content/66/647/e382 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
- Supplementary information PDF Table 2
This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via RCGP at https://bjgp.org/content/66/647/e382 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.